this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
7 points (73.3% liked)
AskUSA
227 readers
93 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that the areas where it's important to switch have pretty much already switched. Science is essentially all metric.
The areas where it tends to linger are:
Places where existing standards are in place and would be expensive to change. Like, paper size or parts used on a given class of device or something -- dishwashers have a 1/4" hex key on the underside to rotate the device if it gets stuck. Recipes.
Things where the public has a general "sense" of something in their heads from experience, like temperature outside or miles traveled.
Entrenched standards probably aren't going to actively change purely for the purposes of metrification -- like, tripods for cameras are going to continue to be 1/4 inch diameter shafts -- but if a new standard comes out these days, it's probably based on metric. I expect that there'll be kind of a natural phasing out as existing standards naturally get replaced as some sort of new need arises.