this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
402 points (93.9% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5441 readers
255 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Title is incorrect. Of these 98 days, the grid was 100% renewable-powered for only 4.84 hours per day on average (10.1 hours per day maximum). The title implies that it was renewable-powered for 24 hours per day.
The actual title of the linked pdf is:
This article seems to be a response to accusations that variable power output of solar/wind causes blackouts. In this study, there were zero blackouts caused by 100% renewable power supply. Also, the study period was an arbitrary set of 116 days. The 98 days were not a continuous period, nor were they 98 days of a 365 day period.
(At time of this comment, the title of this post is "The California grid ran on 100% renewables with no blackouts or cost rises for a record 98 days".)
Thank you, i knew there must be a catch within the article and my first question is always on how they handle the night. Guess the report isn't about that.
Storage batteries. They more than doubled storage batteries to save excess daytime solar for use overnight.
I learned that "batteries" can literally took many form, some use molten salt, some use gravity, some use water, and some use the battery we all know. Am actually kinda curious on what works for them, but since it isn't really 100% consecutively it doesn't matter in this case.
PG&e owns two massive water reservoirs in the Sierra Nevada Central region called courtright and wishon. They funnel water up and down a steep gradient between shaver lake and the reservoirs to control peak energy demand. It's actually a really effective and mostly efficient system, especially when rain and snow refill the upper reservoirs.
Ah yes, an average of 4.84 hours per day running entirely on renewables.
There's definitely enough storage to enable that reliably. /s
People still dream about battery (or any other) storage as some magic solution. They simply don't understand the amount of energy that has to be stored to make it really renewables only. We'll get there eventually, but it will take a lot of time and resources. And we don't have time.
Our home averaged 7.5kWh/day in December (we did not travel and we're home with family the entire time); this is about 10x less daily energy than the battery capacity of a modern EV.
Now, we have gas heating and stove/oven, so that adds a huge amount of load
but my numbers above are for 24hr energy, and batteries wouldn't need to supply that whole time.
Of course, this doesn't address cost, and it doesn't address natural resources, like you mentioned. But that actual required amount of energy per capita can certainly be achieved with current battery technology.
Sure, but the majority of your energy is not renewable, plus you are emitting a lot of CO2. Heat pump for heating and electrical appliances would quickly rise your consumption to something like 30+kWh/day and then you'd have under three days of car battery. Also relying on car battery is tricky as in such case you can't use your car and your car's battery might be fairly empty when you need it.
At night is when you release the water in your hydroelectric dams. We need more solar so the dams dont flow when the sun is shining.
Jacobson is a fantasist who has been publishing misleading work for years claiming there are no issues with 100% renewables right now (or indead there were no issues 10 years ago).