224
Her Mental Health Treatment Was Helping. That’s Why Insurance Cut Off Her Coverage.
(www.propublica.org)
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
224 points (98.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2084 readers
1310 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes.
Remove the for profit "health" insurance companies and provide people with these things. It will reduce our societal costs and improve outcomes for all.
You're changing the argument. Should someone pay for those things? Yeah. The Scandinavian countries do and they're much better off for it.
It's silly to suggest health insurance companies should be compelled to though.
What's silly is for profit healthcare.
Health insurance companies need to be disbanded so that we as a society can afford these things.
Our healthcare industry is just a massive profiteering racket.
Yes, because prevention is superior to treatment after the fact in both outcomes & overall cost.
Though it seems you have a differing understanding of "Medically Necessary" to my own so i suspect we won't agree on this.
"For profit healthcare" is a misnomer is should be called something like "profit equilibrium maintenance : healthcare edition"
The best outcome for a "for profit" is profit, not healthcare. Given the choice between larger profits and better healthcare outcomes the profit will win out, every time.
... Yes. It's a society. Society should bear the costs of what the most vulnerable need.