this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
484 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19293 readers
2419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Democrats blame Attorney General Merrick Garland for delaying prosecution of Donald Trump over the January 6 Capitol attack, allowing him to win reelection before facing trial.

Critics argue Garland wasted critical time before appointing a special prosecutor in late 2022, enabling Trump to evade accountability due to DOJ policy barring prosecution of sitting presidents.

While Trump faces ongoing civil lawsuits, his return to power threatens pardons for convicted rioters and continued revisionism about the attack.

Despite public disapproval of Trump's actions, he successfully leveraged misinformation to regain the presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

But think of how NOBLY the Dems have lost the Republic! Completely polite and norm-abiding as what remains of our democracy is torn to shreds and pissed on!

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Something something high road

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

When they go low.. We sit idly by and get buried in their shit

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just a couple months ago, you would have screamed at anyone who engaged in such talk on the grounds that they were Russians that wanted Trump to win.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's about the reading comprehension I suspected you were working with in our interactions a couple months ago.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Centrists insisted that his critics were all Russians who would be gone as soon as the election was over. You all knew they weren't.

Condescension is no replacement for defensible positions. And it sure as hell wasn't a replacement for a good candidate.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Centrists insisted that his critics were all Russians who would be gone as soon as the election was over.

Again, you're proving that your low level of reading comprehension has been consistent these past few months, but not much else, considering that's not even close to what was being said.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doubling down on condescension is also no substitute for defensible positions.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

PugJesus literally called my previous account a Russian asset.

Amazing how he ignores his own choices and past.