The article clarifies, but you know people don't read articles. Posters read headlines and then go right to the comments section. All I was doing was taking the information in the article and posting it in the comments section.

And it's not like I'm fucking welcome in my own home lol

[–] fishabel@discuss.online -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But it’s not important to create an argument against something just because you dislike the title of the article. It just makes you sound like you’re in favor of locking them up.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's important for discussions to be based in reality and not a misleading title.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s not misleading. It’s just focused on a specific group, because that’s the publication. You’re asking a lot from “journalists” ;)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Even if you allow for the special focus it still implies China is targeting gay erotica, as opposed to gay erotica. Those are very different stories. Plus, this forum doesn't have a focus on any specific groups for which the publication's bias should be accounted.

And so that's what I did. I clarified what was missing in the title. That's all.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just did your job eh?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I do this for fun. Not everyone is a paid shill out to get you.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 0 points 3 days ago

You sure don’t seem to be having fun on here