this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
841 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

60299 readers
2964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 149 points 2 days ago (10 children)

The very first time I saw an ad for Honey I knew there had to be a catch. Nothing is ever free.

It wasn't immediately obvious how they were going to make money, though. I figured they'd just sell gather and sell user data. I had completely forgotten about affiliate links. But they probably also sell your data for good measure.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The only thing truly free are those little pencils at IKEA.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those are priced into the products IKEA sells.

[–] geelgroenebroccoli@feddit.nl 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I only go there for the free pencils and make my furniture out of the pencils. Checkmate

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can cut down on your pencil quota by also adding free FedEx boxes to your furniture.

Edit: Remembered why I thought of this: http://web.archive.org/web/20060821064958/http://www.fedexfurniture.com/pictures.html

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No purchase required, though. You can just take all the pencils and paper rulers you want!

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That just means the actual customers are paying for you.

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

Heh, sucker's more free pencils for me

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do they still exist? In China and Malaysia where I've been living for the last 10 years there are only QR codes at the items that you can scan with the IKEA app.

If you don't want to install the app, all you can do is take photos of the labels, or bring your own pens.

[–] Koarnine@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still exist in UK as of last year, short wooden pencils stacked in a plastic cube, free for as many as you can take before security gets angy

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's what I'm used to from Germany as well, but seems like they either never implemented it in Asia, or got rid of it a long time ago.

[–] megane_kun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

They certainly exist in Ikea here in the Philippines. I've been there a few months ago and the free pencils and paper tape measures (rulers?) are still there and being used.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

There are plenty of free things on the Internet. You're commenting on a free social network.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I pay $100/month for internet access.

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

You also don't see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

Kind reminder to donate to whoever is hosting your instance. Covering a share of costs increases the chances they will continue running it.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I pay $100/month for internet access.

Which you'd also pay if you used Honey.

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

You also wouldn't have paid to use Honey.

You also don't see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

That one, that's a valid argument.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You also wouldn't have paid to use Honey.

That's my point? Nothing is ever truly free?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

But how does that statement contribute to anything?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Wow, internet is expensive where you are. I pay £28 (about $35) a month for 1gig up/down in the UK.

[–] Asterisms@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

internet in the states and canada can be so expensive :( i’m lucky that my provider has a program for ppl on disability where we pay $10-$20 CAD/mo. I can’t remember the exact amount, nor what up/down we get right now, but it’s pretty decent!

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

It's more expensive in remote areas and areas without competition.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Capitalists hate competition, and ISPs have it down to a science.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

I pay $100/month for internet access.

Irrelevant to the point, but damn that feels so high. I pay something like 30 or 40 euros per month for symmetric 500 megabit, in one of the countries with the highest internet prices in Europe.

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

Well yes, someone is, but my point was, there are loads of examples on the Internet where something truly is free to use and hosted by someone who doesn't ask for anything. There is real altruism to be found here.

You also don’t see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

Yes, this is where the difference comes in. When something is free AND the people running it have ridiculous amounts of money to spend on sponsorships and ads... Then you can be sure there's a catch.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

"Someone" is paying to host every website. The point is it's free to you.

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

The catch about Lemmy is that degenerates like me are here

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

It's not, my point was more that you see a lot of things being hosted on the Internet for free just out of people's goodness and curiosity.

Honey is not one of them. But it's not the fact that Honey is free to use that's the suspicious part. It's the fact that they had an awful lot of money to spend on sponsor spots for a free product/service.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

I help pay for my instance to run, nothing is free but there is freeloading. Otherwise someone is else pays for the electricity that powers my server requests as I shitpost on lemmy

[–] madnotangry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy isn't paying out the nose for influencers to hook their stuff. I haven't seen any Lemmy instances advertise at all, much less to the extent that Honey has.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, that's the major difference, but the original comment pointed out you can't have free things without getting assfucked one way or another. You can, but those free things don't spend millions on advertising themselves.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s definitely not 2005 any more.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not, but go look on github. There are so many projects out there that aren't monetized. People just built them for the fun of it.

Hell, the entire KDE software suite is not monetized to the best of my knowledge. They ask for donations, but they don't make a buck off you in any way unless you voluntarily donate.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The icing on the cake was lying about the best deals when partnered stores paid them to do so.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There are so many online companies that do this, like Glassdoor. They are willing to share any information they have about a place until they're paid to remove it. Goes for bad reviews and salary info as much as it does for coupon codes.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

There was a video years and years ago where they explained their business model and it has either since changed or they lied. Back then it was that they offered deals through sponsorships or something. I don't remember. It was years ago. What's frustrating is that I remember seeing that video and it definitely made me think it wasn't a scam. Probably had the same effect on a lot of other people too.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've never seen an ad for honey, not heard of it's existence before this video.

Ad blocking is the way

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hmm ad blocking is not enough, because many YouTubers sponsor Honey inside of their videos. Maybe you also use Sponsorblock.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

No I didn't use sponsor block, I often manually skip sponsored sections.

But none of the channels I follow shill for honey, apparently, and that's a big plus.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

I use Sponsorblock, but still hear ads sometimes because it's not applied to downloads.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Nothing is ever free.

TANSTAAFL comrade!

[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Frankly I’m surprised it took this long for anyone to notice they were swapping referral codes. I always assumed that was what was in it for them. Perhaps the extent to which they’ve done it is greater than we knew, but if you have ever heard of referral codes, it seems obvious that this is how such an extension would monetize.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

So you don‘t use extensions at all then because you‘re already sniffing the uBlock Origin scandal?