this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
65 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19298 readers
1513 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 83 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Between the lines: Tariffs are going to be used as a tool to transfer wealth from the bottom to the top. But there are some global players who want in on that action, so Trump is going to pick hand pick some winners in exchange for foreign policy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I hate how accurate you probably are. Man people are fucking stupid. Like we can mostly sit here and figure out their stupidly transparent plans to fuck us, but most people are so aggressively against critical thinking that the 1% basically gets away with anything they want, no matter how fucking obvious their corruption is

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What I don't understand is, if they want to be constantly making money and increasing profits, what are they going to do when they have ALL the money?
The lower class isn't going to have any money to spend, so the upper class will stop making money.
People won't be able to consume the unnecessary goods that the rich produce so their businesses will collapse, profits will stop rolling in, the economy will collapse, the dollar will crash, and all the money they worked so diligently to hoard will become useless.
So what exactly is their endgame?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Lot's of good responses here.

It's not just money they accumulate, but the capacity for violence. In the past when money wasn't enough to get what they want, they sponsor a coup or a harassment campaign or assassination. If they have a monopoly on (state) violence then they can just give their workers company scrip in place of money to spend at the company stores for essentials. They've done it in the past and this time around it might rhyme with crypto. As long as their police have their needs taken care of and get some extra perks, they will gladly bust skills to break those pesky union upstarts.

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

Drone us all down and live happily ever after with their army of robot servants. Asimov wrote a book about the outcome. The Naked Sun.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

what exactly is their end game?

Slavery

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

They have no endgame. Most of them are old want want to grab what they can right now, with no regard to consequences.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Did you ever watch the movie Elysium? Because that. Except they go to Antarctica to escape climate change and build a big fuck off wall instead of a space station.