this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
760 points (97.3% liked)
Privacy
32649 readers
372 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well they don't. I don't want to justify the opt-in by default but, again (cf my reply history) here they are precisely trying NOT to send anything usable to their own server. They are sending data that can't be used by anything else but your phone. That's the entire point of homomorphic encryption, even the server they are sent to do NOT see it as the original data. They can only do some kind of computations to it and they can't "revert" back to the original.
If they don't look at my data, they don't even have to encrypt it.
If they don't try to look at my data, they don't need to wonder whether they should ask my permission.
I don't want Apple or anybody else looking at my data, for any reason, is my point.
I agree on permission.
Yet I'll still try to clarify the technical aspect because I find that genuinely interesting and actually positive. The point of homomorphic encryption is that they are NOT looking at your data. They are not encrypting data to decrypt them. An analogy would be that :
Thanks to that process we know both something about our card (the number of red shards) and all other cards (total number of red shards on the bowl) without having actually revealed what our card is. We have done so without sharing our data (the uncut original card) and it's not possible to know its content, even if somebody were to take all cups.
So... that's roughly how homomorphic encryption works. It's honestly fascinating and important IMHO, the same way that cryptography and its foundation, e.g. one way functions or computational complexity more broadly, are basically the basis for privacy online today.
You don't have to agree with how Apple implemented but I'd argue understanding how it works and when it can be used is important.
Let me know if it makes sense, it's the first time I tried to make an analogy for it.
PS: if someone working on HE has a better analogy or spot incorrect parts, please do share.
It makes sense, but you totally miss my point. To go with your analogy, my point is:
That's it.
I don't care how fascinating the technology is and how clever Apple are: they are not welcome to implement it on my device. I didn't invite them to setup a card game and I expect them not to break into my house to setup a table.
I wish, sadly that's not how using non open source or open hardware devices work. You are running their software on their hardware with their limitations. It's not a PC or SBC.
Edit: if we were to stick to the card game analogy, it'd be more like playing the card game in a hotel, in a room that you rented, rather than at home.
It's funny how it feels like my money when I pay for the device at the cash register.
And it should, unfortunately it's not. Maybe right to repair and other laws will, hopefully, change that but for now, it's bundling, part pairing and locks all the way down.