this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
257 points (96.4% liked)
A Comm for Historymemes
1608 readers
303 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Lemmy.world rules.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
??? Do you have a source that it was seen as a betrayal? Poland was under Soviet control before the war ended.
That's like French communist partisans that fought for 5 years being angry at the Soviets for selling France to the Western Allies.
You can't sell what you don't own.
The war in Europe started to protect Poland's sovereignty. Many Poles see Poland being left to communist influence as betrayal by the Allies. However, one could argue that the intention was to protect Poland from the Nazis, not from the Soviets. And additionally, the Soviets were allies of the Allies.
But as one person mentioned, at the very least Poland received land from the German territory, which is a huge deal so it probably assuaged the anger felt by many Poles. Also, the West had been very generous and welcoming to allow Poles to remain in their country for those who don't want to return to communist Poland. So yeah, the Poles were compensated in that regard.
To add to other links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoney_War
Also Russia actually invaded Poland together with Germany:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
It was only after Hitler attacked Russia they switched sides and became allies to the West, but West let them keep the land they took.
To Poland events of world war 2 continued until 1989 when it finally escaped Russia's control.
Queue in tankies spouting slurs and *no russia saved the wurld *
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-yalta-conference-at-seventy-five-lessons-from-history/
https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2020/02/the-yalta-conference-was-more-than-a-victors-feast?lang=en
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/08/18/betrayal-at-yalta/eb3e17d5-d685-4867-9c66-90efcf875c5b/
I read that entire first article and nowhere does it claim the Polish people thought that the West sold them to Soviets.
"This [agreement on Poland] is so elastic that the Russians can stretch it all the way from Yalta to Washington without ever technically breaking it,” Admiral William Leahy, Chief of Staff to Franklin Roosevelt.
“I know, Bill, but it is the best I can do for Poland at this time,” Franklin Roosevelt.
It reiterated what I wrote: You can't sell what you don't own.
The other links are paywalled. But I can see the last one was written by Robert Novack- a notorious right wing journalist. He would write anything to make a Democrat look bad. In this case, FDR.
Clearly you didn't read it thoroughly enough. Early on in that first article:
The author is talking for Poles without showing that's actually what Poles said.
It would be like saying "For French partisans, Yalta meant a betrayal by Soviets."
I claim a majority of Poles did not like Soviet rule but did not blame America because it was out of America's control.
Then you admit that it did claim that the Polish people thought the West sold them to the Soviets, contrary to what you said.
But hey, here, have the Polish PM in exile's own words:
Hell yeah brother. Fact check those fascists