this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
44 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19298 readers
2059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Here's what I don't like about this whole situation.

This started off as one of Trump's little episodes of dementia where he says something outlandish to get attention and was treated accordingly, with Denmark definitively saying that Greenland was going nowhere.

Now, they're saying that "Greenland independence is possible, but joining the US is unlikely"

This is basically saying "Well, maaaaaybe......". It's capitulating to Trump. It is giving him wiggle room, and it is giving credibility to a ridiculous idea that should be dismissed out of hand. Even if it isn't their intention, Denmark is essentially telling Trump there's a path forward, instead of telling him there's no path. All this is going to do is feed Trump's ego. And it's going to set Trump on a path where he sincerely believes he "deserves" Greenland, if he's not there already.

Denmark needs to make a clear and unequivocal statement that Greenland is a territory of Denmark and will remain that way. Period, full stop. And then kick Don Jr. out of the country to send a statement to him. But the last thing Denmark needs to do is to be giving Trump a path forward, and that's exactly what they're doing by going from "Not gonna happen" to "unlikely".

Denmark blinked. Trump will capitalize.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yep. I think there should be mandatory training among world leaders on boundary pushing techniques by people with narcissistic disorders. Giving this any attention beyond dismissing it and moving on only feeds the narcissist to keep testing limits and pushing boundaries.

Many an abused spouse talk about how their narcissist other wore them down and eventually they succumbed to horrible power dynamics. In the US, we've been that spouse for a long time. Now the entire freaking world is the spouse.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, Denmark has said all along that the fate of Greenland is up to Greenlanders, not Denmark. And that's the truth. Denmark will always welcome Greenland in the realm, but it's ultimately up to them if they want to stay.

At the end of the day, I can't imagine that Greenland would want to leave one of the world's best social systems, including a world-class healthcare system, to join the world's crappiest healthcare system and a non-functional democracy.

Now, Trump may take Greenland by force. That's a whole different story.