Asklemmy

44331 readers

1145 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

194

What are you surprised that people pay for, when there are free alternatives in existence? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 3 days ago by Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

224 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was going through my Wal-Mart+ subscription plan that I got for free and I saw their offers. One of which was EMeals, that was a 60-day trial. I thought that this was like Blue Apron or other meal delivery services so I thought I'd take a crack at it and hope that it would get me on a path to eat better.

Turns out, it's just a meal planner. And it's absurd to me why and how would anyone pay for something when there are countless and countless recipes and meal planners readily available for free. Who'd the fuck would want to pay for a planner? That's like paying for a calendar app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's not that odd that they have a preference, even if it costs them. My work provides tea bags and milk, but I bring my own because I like them more.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but Dunkin for coffee??

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's like the yuengling of coffee. Nothing special but it's cheap and inoffensive.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

I think the problem is that some Starbucks fans are pretentious. There are better and cheaper coffee everywhere but some of them will just choose the more expensive one and flash their premium membership card to you.