this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
187 points (97.9% liked)

Futurology

1886 readers
45 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

People need to start having realistic conversations why they are building homes in places prone to natural disasters climate change or not.

Why is there a need for people I live in beach condos that require all that extra maintenance and are hurricane path?

Why build them near areas know for wild fires?

They over build these dangerous areas and now being checked by nature. There is a probably a reason why these areas were not settled that's much until modern tech allowed people to brute force into them.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can still build in wildfire zones as long as you don't clad your house in tinder. Which I'm guessing is the bulk of the homes that burned. Roofs in particular are the major source of catching embers because it's all flammable material. Make every house have metal roofs and fire resistant siding and this level of destruction is far less likely

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why metal?

Just use clay, it doesn't conduct heat as easily and makes for great isolation:

Plus it should be far quieter when it rains/hails.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Metal, clay, concrete, whatever. As long as it isn't the default combustible shingles made of an oil by-product.

Asphalt shingles account for most residential roofing demand with 81% of the overall market in 2023, according to a new report by The Freedonia Group.

Any fire prone area that puts petroleum based anything on 80% of its buildings roofs is flirting with devastation like this. Hopefully we can learn something out the other side and mandate noncombustible roofing from here on out.