Asklemmy

44331 readers

910 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

194

What are you surprised that people pay for, when there are free alternatives in existence? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 3 days ago by Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

224 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was going through my Wal-Mart+ subscription plan that I got for free and I saw their offers. One of which was EMeals, that was a 60-day trial. I thought that this was like Blue Apron or other meal delivery services so I thought I'd take a crack at it and hope that it would get me on a path to eat better.

Turns out, it's just a meal planner. And it's absurd to me why and how would anyone pay for something when there are countless and countless recipes and meal planners readily available for free. Who'd the fuck would want to pay for a planner? That's like paying for a calendar app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Streaming services are raising prices because prestige television was expensive and are using ads as a way to reduce the bill.

And you don't have to pay for streaming if you don't find it too be worth it. I've cancelled subscriptions because the increased price wasn't worth it.

[–] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe the television being produced ought to stop being garbage that nobody wants.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

They tried making prestige TV first, not enough people bought it.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sidenote: Lol I'm getting downvotes for mocking streaming giants and ads on Lemmy. That's different 🤔.

Honestly, I hear you. Media isn't easy to make and takes a ton of talented people a lot of hours to accomplish. I also drop off of subscribing to stuff if it was really nice but "enshittified" into forcing ads into every interaction.

Something needs to change fundamentally though, because we're once again on the cable-TV slope of "20 minutes of entertainment extended to 45 minutes by interrupting it with the exact same ad of a mega corporation pretending to be an underdog influencer."

My personal take is that if your average person were paid fairly, they'd have the money to spend on entertainment where ad-pollution wouldn't be necessary, and if the entertainment distributors/platforms/whatevs asked the fair amount required to pay everyone involved fairly, everyone would be happy.

Lol a guy can dream.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago

And I wish that kind of world existed where people could fund that kind of media landscape.

I've just been aware that, for over a decade, streaming prices weren't sustainable because they were subsidized by cable and broadcast.