Asklemmy

44331 readers

1024 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

193

What are you surprised that people pay for, when there are free alternatives in existence? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 2 days ago by Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

223 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was going through my Wal-Mart+ subscription plan that I got for free and I saw their offers. One of which was EMeals, that was a 60-day trial. I thought that this was like Blue Apron or other meal delivery services so I thought I'd take a crack at it and hope that it would get me on a path to eat better.

Turns out, it's just a meal planner. And it's absurd to me why and how would anyone pay for something when there are countless and countless recipes and meal planners readily available for free. Who'd the fuck would want to pay for a planner? That's like paying for a calendar app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Adobe. Someone said they pay $60 a month for it, and are locked in for the year, which they didn’t even know about! All for editing photos. Just editing photos.

[–] AppearanceBoring9229@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It amazes me the amount of people that think theres no alternative to adobe, just for their casual use. I know that for professional it has some features that no other has.

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

I recently purchased Affinity photo, which did most of what I used to use Adobe for. No subscription, one time purchase, and I'll likely never need to worry about that again.

I tried gimp a few times and found it frustrating to use.

[–] Greee1911@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Holdup. It's $60 a month for the adobe suite, which give you access to like 30 aps, including a video editor, DreamWorks, illustrator and a whole bunch more. It's only $20 a month for thw photo suite, which gives you lightroom, photoshop, and bridge. The $60, a month for the suite is absolutely worth it depending on what you are doing.