this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
809 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

7413 readers
965 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 230 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

We fired our fact-checkers, so we cannot verify whether that is true or not.

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True or not, this is the outcome we deserve.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 2 weeks ago

It's the outcome I want to believe as well.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i would like to post a community note saying that i personally believe it to be true

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can assure you it is true as I was there. I was the $100 note.

[–] eltoukan@jlai.lu 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can also assure you it is true. I was given a $100 not.. uh wait no you didn't hear that

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Literally everything about it's anecdotal so the best result a fact-checker could have is a shrug.

Nah they have actual footage from the event

[–] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

The AI replacement says this is true.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They couldn't before they fired them either, so not a lot has changed. Their "fact checkers" were poorly written algorithms that frequently flagged benign content as misinformation.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Their "fact checkers" were poorly written algorithms that frequently flagged benign content as misinformation.

I think the goal was to flag benign content as misinformation to push truthful content to the same level as flat earth content.

So doing exactly what was intended.