this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
346 points (91.6% liked)

memes

10922 readers
3260 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

XML is extremely verbose.
Again, requires some other tooling to generate (I feel I can point to JavaScript for an example of XML manipulation)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

What's funny is that if you use attributes a lot then XML can be about the same size as JSON. But people think there are things you should and shouldn't use attributes for for some reason. The only thing XML has going for it is a really nice schema format, but even today that's pretty moot. JSON schema and others are pretty well supported.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, reading XML without rendering it or at least with syntax highlighting is a pain.

JSON is way nicer.