this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
592 points (96.0% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

3032 readers
828 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: "Gamers use Windows because of its' user experience not our de facto monopoly."

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a "Out of Business" sign. Subtitle: "30 minutes after SteamOS is released"

Edit: Yo, I'm not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew's UX sucks ass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations? How does that help Linux adoption, though.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well if they are losing out on sales due to practices that are incompatible with Linux then companies are less likely to use those practices in the future.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Remember back when people said nothing was wrong with Linux gaming and it was actually game studios that had to start developing for Linux so the studios changed their practices and started developing native Linux games? Yeah, me neither.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Because people were still buying the games on Windows. If people start actively not buying things then it encourages change. If people complain but still buy it anyway then nothing will change. Vote with your wallet (which is what OP is doing).

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Voting with your wallet doesn't work when you're 3% of the 3%. It didn't work to get games on Linux and it won't work to get rid of kernel anticheat. Wanna know what works? Making things work. Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

So what is your problem with what OP is doing? That they aren't personally releasing games to compete with the ones using kernel level anti-cheat?

Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 minutes ago

My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That's unbelievably naive.