this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

29 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

For me, I would choose computer viruses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

XaaS technology. Though I wouldn't even consider it an advancement. Also convergence becoming mainstream. I may not give a crap about Unix philosophy but in some instances they are correct.

[–] Ayylias@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why dont you like xaas? It just describes cloud computing...

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let me rephrase. I'm against taking previously paid applications and turning them into services, refusing to adhere to lifetime licenses and taking features out turning those behind paywalls. Filmora is an example of what I mean.

All for consumers specifically. I don't care about enterprises.

[–] Parallax@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other examples off the top of my head are Photoshop and Office. It doesn't seem like you can really "own" them anymore, at least not current versions.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

At least Microsoft hasn't come out and said its illegal to use old versions like Adobe did. That's just unacceptable.

[–] MattMist@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds like SaaS specifically. In any case, I agree with you, it sucks that you don't get to actually own a piece of software, even though I understand the benefit of a constant revenue stream for the developer so they can continue to push updates (and the second reason why they do it is probably preventing piracy, even though it's still a bit hit or miss - with Adobe CC it's still pretty easy, but Office now can't be cracked IIRC).

I think the best middle ground would be to do what Sketch does with their Mac app or what Photoshop used to do, where you pay a flat fee for the app in its current version, get a few free updates on top and then after some time have to pay again to upgrade to a newer version.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I am in favour of that. Shame that its becoming a more and more rare business model.