this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
262 points (98.9% liked)
Greentext
4792 readers
1180 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Iirc the artillery dug into the muddy ground and ended up mostly over shooting the union lines. But the other reality they were dealing with was the advent of industrial warfare. As you point out rifles were suddenly as easy to use as smoothbores, making infantry a lot more accurate and giving them a lot more range. The Civil War sits at the very start of a period of very bad times for infantry assaults, that wouldn't be solved until tanks were invented in World War 1. Even the generals of World War 1 who grew up watching this problem become worse over their career, could not figure out a good way to solve this problem with solely infantry and artillery. I don't think Lee could be expected to come up with an answer that generals with 50 more years of experience in industrial warfare were unable to find.
Great point -- it was a difficult problem. The Germans in WW1 came up with assault tactics that involved infiltration tactics, storm troopers, mission command, and artillery "creeping barrages", but they had a rich organizational structure developed over decades to allow such experimentation. The Confederate Army was basically created just as their war began.