779
Government Monitoring Those With "Negative" Views of Health Insurance Companies
(www.kenklippenstein.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
779 points (99.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2114 readers
1189 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
big data disagrees
You can't put us all on the little list by definition, because then it would be the big list.
Human person #6382808222 has been identified. Added note: Dislikes being exploited.
A list that includes everyone is useless from a data analysis point of view.
This is not about data analysis. This is about justifying oppression. And if it comes to "we have found you all to be dangerous" the conclusion is "we need to oppress you all"
Wait, how? Because I only know about statistics and you usually want a comprehensive list to work with either partially or in bulk.
I think the point of big data is to collect enough information to extrapolate other qualities about whatever you want to know, so if everyone is on the list then you have no patterns to go off of besides "on Earth" or "in X country".
Side comment: if 99% of people were on the list, the the govt could just oppress everyone with a 99% accuracy rate. It's entirely possibly they could pick a proportion drastically lower than 99%
These people don’t know what Berkeley DB + GMP is.