this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
563 points (98.5% liked)

196

1292 readers
3637 users here now

This community only has one rule.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 87 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I'm like 99% sure that "Violence is never the answer" is just yet ever more rich fuck propaganda.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

It's a good motto to not get into a petty fight for petty shit because of emotion. It did not mean all violence because you also need violence as a defence against violence.

On the other hand, if the next 4 years we(as in us who isn't from the US) didn't see a civil war or violence protest, then people like oop that love to repeat this stuff should totally go outside and touch grass. These teasing is getting tiring.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Adventure time explained it pretty well imo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xakGZvLjI

[–] paperemail@links.rocks 74 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

It’s also very Liberal propaganda.

Martin Luther King Jr. protested and he won so peaceful protest works!

While of course barely mentioning the Black Panthers and how MLK was suddenly a reasonable alternative to their violent resistance.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The only reason MLK didn't do more was because what they were already doing was illegal, and anything more could get them jail time. And this is still what they thought of him and his "peaceful" protests:

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They did the same shit when they pretended that BLM burned down cities. We really don't learn even from our recent history, huh?

Same as it ever was.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 42 points 11 hours ago

And his "peace" was met with an extreme act of violence. Certainly was an answer for someone(s).

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly this. The "carrot and stick" strategy doesn't work without the stick. Every time a nonviolent movement achieves something, it's because they were seen as the preferable alternative to a more militant contemporary.

[–] paperemail@links.rocks 1 points 10 minutes ago

Exactly. The same goes for implementing social welfare in the face of the Soviet Union and local communist movements.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I thought it was just something we taught children