this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025

314 points (95.6% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7791 readers

107 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

314

[sh.it.post] We're #5! We're #5! (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just saw this on AskLemmy at .ml, thought this and chuckled, and now here we are.

Will take the opportunity to thank our admins for what they do, and all you humans for being here and generally being cool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm mostly talking out a technical solution for community redundancy, similar to setting up redundant VM hosts or more accurately like redundant network hardware, where the data and configurations all exist on both servers, and might be load balanced to some degree between both servers, but ultimately should one go down there's no loss of uptime as the other server takes over until the time that it's mate comes back online or a new one is setup and connected

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

But that's infrastructure redundancy, it should rather happen there than at the Lemmy level, no?