politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
luckily the country doesn’t run on executive orders like a dictatorship and we have judges saying things like that still…
The first couple might but eventually it will get before the supreme court and it will get rubber stamped
depressing but realistic
This week.
oh i’m not holding my breath
I mean, it does. And it always has. The executive ultimately has all the power as both other branches have failed to maintain armed forces of their own to enforce the checks and balances.
the armed forces are trained to disobey illegal orders
Yeah, I'm sure they'll feel great when they're killed by someone that doesn't think it's an illegal order.
they don’t just shoot people for not doing things…
Refusing orders can be seen as treason depending on the circumstances. While the ideal is you disarm and arrest the member to stand trial, if that's not possible and they present immediate danger lethal force can be used.
You seem to be thinking everyone is armed to the teeth pointing weapons at each other at a briefing. It's usually people sitting at tables or desks like a classroom.
Edit: weapons usually aren't even allowed anywhere near briefing rooms
I'm well aware, you seem to be either not believing we're in fascism, or you believe the make believe rules that contain society are divine laws that everyone will always follow.
Trump pardoning the j6 group was a signal that as long as you're loyal to Trump, you will not have legal consequences. That removes the rules, as long as you do the Reich thing.
I don't believe either of those things. I still believe they aren't pointing guns at each other in briefings though. No one would get shot. They would get a court martial. Shooting people within the military would cause splinters quickly that would fragment the presidents power and lay the groundwork for a potential coop attempt. It would be stupid for a dictator to start that.
Well good news, one of us will be proven right by the end of the month.
How is that good news?, haha
Edited to throw in the haha to help understand tone