840
LDAC (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 24 points 2 years ago

Wait, did Apple implement its own codec? I thought even the Airpods Max used AAC, which is lossy.

As for Qualcomm, only aptX Lossless is lossless and I'm not aware of many products supporting it (most supports aptX HD at most)

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the problem (imo) isn't lossy v lossless. It's that the supported codecs are part of the Bluetooth standard and they were developed in like the 90s.

There are far better codecs out there and we can't use them without incompatible extensions on Bluetooth.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 years ago

There's a push for Opus now, it's the perfect codec for Bluetooth because it's a singular codec that fits the whole spectrum from low bandwidth speech to high quality audio, and it's fully free

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Opus is great, but there is no option to make it lossless, like what WavPack (also a free-as-in-freedom codec) provides for example.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago

Transparency is good enough, it's intended to be a good fit for streaming, not masters for editing

Why not have the option for true lossless available so that Bluetooth can be scaled up to sound good on even the highest end of systems.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 years ago

You literally can not distinguish 192 Kbps Opus from true lossless. Not even with movie theater grade speakers. You only benefit from lossless if you're editing / applying multiple effects, etc, which you will not do at the receiving end of a Bluetooth connection.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

The newer H2 SoC AirPods support ALAC, Apple’s lossless codec; however, their phones don’t yet support it, so the only way to use it is with the Vision Pro.

[-] zod000@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

AFAIK, ALAC will not be actually lossless over bluetooth for the sames reason LDAC can't be lossless; there simply isn't enough bandwidth. That doesn't mean that it won't sound great or perhaps work better than LDAC.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It runs over a 5GHz connection, not a 2.4GHz connection like bluetooth.

[-] zod000@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Oh, so they aren't on bluetooth at all? That is an entirely different story, thanks for the info.

[-] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Wait what? Do they not connect over bluetooth? Please don't tell me they made up more proprietary bullshit.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, the protocol used is currently proprietary. That being said, so was ALAC at launch and they later made it open-sourced and royalty free.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
840 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

33218 readers
795 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS