I mean the very simple answer they'll have to any point you make is "it's a lie told by to get unfairly and/or illegally."
Which is why earnest discussion is so difficult. Neither side can really trust that the other side to use words that match intent. I, for sure, don't trust anything a Right-leaning pundit says about their reasons for legislative positions.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)
I mean the very simple answer they'll have to any point you make is "it's a lie told by to get unfairly and/or illegally."
Which is why earnest discussion is so difficult. Neither side can really trust that the other side to use words that match intent. I, for sure, don't trust anything a Right-leaning pundit says about their reasons for legislative positions.