657

Summary

Democratic lawmakers, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, criticized Trump for failing to address rising food costs despite campaign promises to lower prices "immediately."

In a letter, they accused Trump of focusing on mass deportations and January 6 pardons instead of tackling grocery inflation, which rose 1.8% in 2024, with egg prices up 36.8%.

Trump’s administration defended its actions, citing efforts to reduce inflation by cutting energy costs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

He passed way way more than the IRA

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I mentioned the anti-trans bill. Oh, yeah. There was also republican border policy. And of course the aid to a genocidal apartheid regime.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Again. This is just bitter copium. He past some of the biggest legislation since FDR. Of course it would be pointless having that discussion with you as you clearly are already bad faith about this topic with your selective memory.

You don't like how politics works. I get it. None of us do. But this incessant hostility to the Dems is not going to move the needle unless we move beyond FPTP. Figure it out.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

He past some of the biggest legislation since FDR.

BBB came closest. It was killed in the senate as intended. The Inflation Reduction Act was the biggest legislation that Biden passed. It was so watered down and pro-corporate that Manchin cosponsored.

He's not in office anymore. He's not running anymore. You don't have to carry water for him anymore. You don't have to lie on his behalf anymore.

You don’t like how politics works. I get it. None of us do.

Ha.

But this incessant hostility to the Dems is not going to move the needle unless we move beyond FPTP.

Democrats will never move beyond FPTP. "Just switch to RCV!" is a fucking pipe dream. Using it as a prerequisite for criticism of the party just means that you don't want any criticism of the party ever.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

There was more than BBB. I don't need to carry water for him but I do prefer to have a conversation grounded in reality that isn't emotive and charged every time either. It's impossible to discuss anything because every approach is devoid of nuance, details, or the boring entrapings of how policy actually gets done. It's a lot more fun to screech about genocide Joe in'it?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

There was more than BBB.

There wasn't even BBB. It was killed by Democrats without even coming to the floor for a vote. Do tell, how did Old Man Biden out-progressive LBJ?

I don’t need to carry water for him

So stop.

but I do prefer to have a conversation grounded in reality that isn’t emotive and charged every time either

If you prefer a conversation grounded in reality, don't say that Biden passed massive legislation that he didn't pass. If you prefer conversation grounded in reality, don't pretend that FPTP is going to come out of a party that considered the filibuster more important than democracy itself.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Hey man, keep screeching about how emotionally buthurt you are and keep calling people liars. In the meantime, the rest of us are going to roll up our sleeves and get to work building. The boomer dems aren't going to be around forever and we gotta move forward. This whole brooding in bitterness and defeatism is bullcrap.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Hey man, keep screeching about how emotionally buthurt you are and keep calling people liars. In the meantime, the rest of us are going to roll up our sleeves and get to work building.

I've seen what you build. There's a reason you have to oversell it as being second only to the New Deal.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

And just to be clear. I hate the Dems. Probably more than you do. I hate Biden with a passion. I hate Kamala - or Hillary 2.0- next too. So much I unregistered from the Hem party.

It's just we gotta work within the system somehow or we just check out. I don't know. Im praying for all the boomer politicians to check out. I've lost most hope anyway.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And just to be clear. I hate the Dems.

Just to be clear, I think you're lying.

It’s just we gotta work within the system somehow or we just check out.

Working within the system doesn't require you to keep campaigning for a man who will never run for office again.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
657 points (96.7% liked)

politics

31135 readers
4155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS