this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

Automotive Industry

445 readers
56 users here now

News and discussion about the automotive industry.

Maybe also interesting:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The efficient market hypothesis does not claim anything about “rational”.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'll amend my statement. If markets were actually efficient then Warren Buffet couldn't have become a billionaire because everything would have already been "priced in".

[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

This paper concludes that Buffett did essentially do factor-investing.

I don't really understand why the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and factor investing don't contradict each other but smarter people think they don't (e.g. Fama who co-invented both). The general consensus seems to be that the weak form of EMH is correct but the semi-strong and the strong EMH probably not. However, while markets may not be perfectly efficient they can still be very close. This is why I believe that "priced in" often works in practice and is a useful concept.