474
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

David Lebryk, the longest-serving career official at the U.S. Treasury, is resigning after a conflict with Elon Musk’s allies over access to a key government payment system.

Musk’s team has sought control of the system, which distributes $6 trillion annually in Social Security, Medicare, federal salaries, and other payments.

Traditionally, only career officials handle it.

Lebryk’s departure raises concerns, as he served under multiple administrations, including Trump’s, and was widely respected for his nonpartisan leadership.

His exit signals growing instability in financial governance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Why the fuck did you want a Federal job if you didn’t give a damn about the future of the country enough to stand for it you worthless fucks?

I mean... because it comes with a paycheck?

I'm not sure why you think everyone with a federal government job is motivated by patriotism.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah it's all pretty silly. This guy is known for being nonpartisan and fools are demanding he suddenly be partisan. How about treating him like he isn't an actual person and sympathizing that his career is ending.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Being nonpartisan in a democratic country means protecting democracy.

He's a coward and got his, then got out.

He's the kind of individualist this country is designed to produce

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

I mean, I understand that to an extent, they are very stable jobs, but you have to literally take an oath of office to get the job.

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdfimage/sf61.pdf

I might not believe in god, but I do believe in keeping promises, and it's why I've never approached a job that required such an oath myself. That and the fact that I have never had that kind of faith in the US government. But I'd like to believe if you did have the kind of faith in it, to get a job in the government, that you would take your oath seriously. Maybe that makes me naive, but the reality is at some point someone has to make some kind of sacrifice to stop people like Trump.

Biden and the Democrats weren't willing to sacrifice their principles and fight dirty, and here we are. As things progress, the sacrifices made to succeed get larger and larger. It's not nice, but it's reality.

I only wish I could have had that kind of faith in the US government. Because it would have been nice to stand for something instead of feeling like only good things we can stand for we have to cobble together on our own.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I would bet for a lot of people, a government oath means as much to them as agreeing to an EULA.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Little reminder: You don’t have to be a patriot to do what’s right.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
474 points (98.8% liked)

News

39199 readers
3490 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS