this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
110 points (92.3% liked)
Asklemmy
44800 readers
1198 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
except when a temporary disruption in the connection results in new posts/comments/etc to not get delivered
But that's true of any network connected messaging protocol, making sure a message is delivered could be implemented client side. The issue with AP objects not making it to other clients / servers is more about federation discovery.
no, it isn't for
the client shouldn't be dealing with issues between servers. that's the servers responsibility. if the server has told the client that it got the message, what is there anymore for the client to do?
I don't think so. if you know the recipient, you know it's servername too. and then your server can forward it to theirs.
I think the problem here is that messages are not always delivered.