this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
402 points (98.8% liked)

196

4669 readers
852 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[alt text: first, there's text over a happy Albinauric from Elden Ring saying "me when I thought recycling would save the world. second, there's text over a sad/depressed Albinauric from Elden Ring saying "me after I found out that plastic corporations invented plastic recycling to put the responsibility onto the consumer even though they knew plastic recycling was both chemically and financially not feasible, and now I have plastic in my brain, lungs, and testicles".]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

https://www.hsi.org/news-resources/mis-labelled-fur-uk/

Yes it was a huge news story a few years ago, a lot of designer labels were just not labeling and quietly claiming it was synthetic or labeling real fur synthetic.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they’re confusing the fact that faux fur is less environmentally friendly than real fur. Real fur can biodegrade, faux fur is plastic. It’s the “vegan leather” debate.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I'm not confusing anything I added a link, there was a news story years ago exposing fashion brands not labeling real fur (implying it's synthetic because real fur must be labeled) or labeling it synthetic when it was real fur.

[–] Micromot@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are more animal friendly but just as environmentally bad is the result of my google search

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I'm referring to real fur being labeled synthetic it was a big news story a few years ago.