this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
636 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19777 readers
3861 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fucking Hell. Like the Nazis burning their Records.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] subignition@fedia.io 131 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

we shouldn't have records systems not subject to FOIA

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 89 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

We shouldn't have a majority of voters in the U.S choosing a Nazi, but here we are.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Plurality* the majority of registered voters did not vote, voted for harris, or voted 3rd party.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Not voting and voting 3rd party is support for Donald, but whatever makes you sleep better at night

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 8 hours ago

Practically speaking, they let Trump win. But that doesn't mean they actually like Trump or approve of what he's doing. Imagining that everyone who didn't vote for Harris is a die-hard Trumper just leads to despair, which benefits Trump.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What a wierd world, where someone makeing choice C or D means they really support A, Im glad you can read about 1/3rd of Americans minds, must be quite noisy

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, choosing not to vote for example is indirectly making a choice. Weird I know, again, whatever helps americans sleep at night.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is not a helpful way of thinking.

Yes, you are perfectly correct, a majority of Americans - either by action or by inaction - supported Trump becoming president.

But that does not inherently mean that a majority of Americans support what Trump is doing as president. Your anger over how the election went - no matter how justified - should not be the guide through which you envision your next steps. That only leads to throwing up your hands in despair, when a more realistic understanding of the situation, driven by pragmatism rather than outrage, would acknowledge that there is a significant corpus of voters who could potentially be motivated to act against what Trump's administration is doing. People vote, or don't, based on assumptions about the world. The more that the reality of a second Trump presidency challenges those assumptions, the more opportunity there is to drive people to action.

Or you can spend the rest of your life complaining about how things went down in 2024 while never actually doing anything useful. Your choice.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I did not say Americans support what he does as president. Youre making a different point

Whats funny is none of yall had this "that's not helpful" attitude when it was the brits throwing themselves in the fire.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I am not saying it is not making a choice, it is making a choice, and with all choices it has consiquinces, what I am saying is that it is, by deffinition not the same choice as SUPPORTING trump. you can say the choice caused trump, you can say it enabled him, but deffinitionaly it is not the same as supporting him, as support is an afermitive thing, and the choices of not voting, voting 3rd party, and voting democrat all are not chosing to suport him

[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not voting is tacit support of the winner in an election. And by that I mean they helped him win. Enabling, helping, supporting, these are all synonyms to me.

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I am sorry to hear your vocabulary has such lack of nuance, it must make having proper indepth conversations hard for you.

Yes what we need is more nuance between different types of support for nazis. That would make a great epitaph for democracy in fact: "We didn't affirmatively choose this."

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I keep seeing this kind of comment, and it irks me. There's nothing actionable here, and it honestly just comes across as defeatist. Oh well, what can we do, turns out a majority/plurality/murder/what the fuck ever of voters prefer Nazis. That's some greasy fucking energy. We're here now, regardless of what ought to be, so let's start talking about how to deal with it.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Probably the easiest thing ever is to start leaning harder on the democrats to use their considerable political and financial resources to play hardball with Trump. I mean real hardball, litigate fucking everything, show up in person and keep those DOGE fucks out with sticks and bricks if need be, or at least Livestream and name and shame them, put together a rapid response team to counter the blatantly unconstitutional shit, get commitments from military officials that they will defend the constitution; literally anything besides wheeling out Schumer or Bernie to give another speech that everyone will ignore. I love Bernie, but we're way past speeches.

Next, start going to protests, start getting involved with trying to push your local government on issues. I am, it's allowed me to network with other local activists and I'm in a better place to be made aware of local needs and local actions. Also part of this is to check in with your network. I know people that voted Trump 1 and stuck with him all the way through the term that are disgusted with what's happening now, we have mutual aid plans in place. It's not much, but it's a start. This is a good opportunity to plant seeds about mutual aid, protest, general strikes in the future, and organizing.

If you have money, start opening up legal cases. If you don't, then start leaning on state politicians about whether they have plans to deal with the fallout. It's finally worth ruminating on about what finally stopped the Nazis' progress East. It wasn't clever signs and chants. Don't be caught unaware for the worst case scenario.

Don't like what I suggest? Use your fucking noggin and think of something better to do and do it. Even if it's yelling at passing cars. Do anything besides roll over. No peace for Nazis, ever.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 21 points 13 hours ago

Those enabling a nazi, are by association also nazis. People need to stop referring to this administration as separate. They are also pushing the agenda, so they are also nazis.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

They technically are, but not until the current administration is out of office, which is somewhere in the realm of never.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

We should, but only for private citizens. Anything government related should be done in public.