this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
213 points (90.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7501 readers
564 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During negotiations with the DNC and the Harris campaign, we were repeatedly told by interlocutors that Harris couldn’t meet any of our basic requests (a policy shift from Biden, a Palestinian speaker at the DNC, a statement distinguishing herself from Trump on Israel, or even a meeting with Michigan families who lost loved ones to Israeli bombs) because of AIPAC-aligned politicians like Fetterman, who might take to TV, rile up suburban white and Jewish voters, and fracture the party’s coalition in a swing state.

That political calculus alienated a key voting bloc, although likely not large enough to have shifted the ultimate election outcomes, that should be part of a durable Democratic majority. But few will ever be held accountable for that choice.

A Fetterman staffer condemning Uncommitted for not advocating for Palestinians 'the right way' is like an arsonist scolding the fire department for using the wrong hose.

Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sarcastic tone, but I was telling the truth there: It is the DNC's fault. The policy and the defeat. And that fact is real cool for anyone who thinks that's the important part.

I'm not mad about Uncommitted's principles, and I don't pin any moral blame on them. But I do think they have shitty tactics. This is a war. The RNC and DNC vs. us. If you have any chance to weaken your opponent, you take it. The Dems will never be your ally, so stop expecting them to.

[–] GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Apologies, it came across as sarcastic but in the direction of defending DNC.