this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
763 points (98.7% liked)

World News

40459 readers
3779 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a private meeting inadvertently broadcast via a hot mic, warned that Donald Trump is seriously considering annexing Canada to secure its critical mineral resources.

Speaking to business and labor leaders, Trudeau claimed Trump’s administration is keenly aware of Canada’s resource wealth and sees annexation as a means to control it.

The comments, cut off after staff realized they were audible, underscore growing economic and political tensions.

He also stressed the need to diversify trade, noting, “Geography means we’re always going to both benefit and be challenged by trade with the United States.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 81 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yo, this won't be an annex. It will be an invasion if he really wants it, same with Greenland. You think Canada will just roll over? Imagine if fucking Mexico decided to take back Texas. (At this point, please do, I could use some new leadership here)

I'm so sorry Canadians, yall just up there doing your thing and these assholes just trying to fuck your shit up.

[–] Excentrifugal_Forz@lazysoci.al 7 points 18 hours ago

It just reminds me of being bullied at school when I was young. Same shit different day.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

I'm in the GTA. I'm ready to die for my country. Are Americans ready to say the same when their president gives them the order?

Rest assured you do not want to fuck with us Canadians. We are deeply embedded in your country. You would see terrorism the likes of which you have only seen in your nightmares. 9/11 will seem like happier times.

Seriously as a Canadian I want them to try.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

I'd rather come up there and die for Canada

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

GTA

Greater Toronto Area? 🙅‍♂️❌️

Grand Theft Auto? 😄👌✅️

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

One of those GTAs prepares you for war much better than the other one.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A lot of Americans would come fight right alongside you. People are pissed.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

This is the main reason I'm sure that a hot war is not going to happen.

Picture how chaotic and dysfunctional the US was in the latter years of the Vietnam war, and that was at least theoretically a war against the great evil "Communism", when the people being killed were "Gooks", who were barely human (at least according to racist propaganda).

Any war on Canada would probably start with maybe 30% support, and only go down from there. Could you even trust American soldiers to follow orders and kill Canadians? Probably some would obey, definitely not all. At a minimum, many would be shooting to miss, rather than carefully aiming.

As soon as Canada was attacked, you'd have Canadians streaming across the largest land border in the world into the US to engage in guerilla warfare -- think the "Troubles" in Northern Ireland, except with much less of a difference in accent. They'd probably be joined by plenty of Americans too.

And, while the US military is very experienced, the US public hasn't had to deal with war on their territory since the Civil War, generations ago.

I won't discount the possibility that the US drums up support for a war by staging a false flag attack or something. But, even with that, I think a majority of the US wouldn't want to risk American lives trying to kill Canadians.

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 17 hours ago

I’m in Minnesota, I’d take up arms against people trying to invade Canada. Fuck those fascists.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Let's go Canada!

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun, totally unrelated to absolutely anything fact:

Three of the top ten longest confirmed sniper kills were Canadian.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's basically our military specialization

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Everywhere snipers are a thing, the best ones are always the ones that grew up hunting. There's a lot of really wild areas with really big game in Canada, it makes sense that some people are going to be very good with a rifle and scope.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

A lot of us grow up around long guns. Handguns are relatively rare.

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 7 points 21 hours ago

As an Australian, I have no idea how my country would respond to this officially. The US alliance is basically our entire defence strategy, and we have fostered that by supporting the US in every conflict they're involved in. On the other hand, we could never go against another Commonwealth nation. The cultural weight is too great.

Perhaps the best we could offer is assurance that any Canadian visitors (refugees) to Australia can probably overstay your visas for as long as necessary. For some reason we only care when immigrants arrive by boat. Just follow all the Aussies when they start leaving your ski fields.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have my understanding and support. Canadians please take care of yourselves.

You had our back in Afghan/Iraq, you have brothers and sisters in the US that will help.

It will take the unity to sabotage any Nazi/maga plans.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

you have brothers and sisters in the US that will help.

They'll intern and deport them

[–] AsheHole@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's something that's been on my mind lately. I wouldn't be able to hide anyone in my home or lay low because I've been vocal about my beliefs my whole life. I've been to more than enough protests to know there's some sort of facial recognition on me, and I've been vocal enough online in recorded social media. The state of surveillance and tech advances in this age is going to make it difficult for anyone to organize and support each other. There's almost no way to stay off the radar and everyone has a cell phone and smart speaker at home listening to their every word.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Absolutely... Then there's the chilling effect that comes with it. People not even attempting to organize because they know what can happen if they do.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

No worries folks, any infiltration violence in resistance isn’t likely to be directed at random civilians.

A lot of vandalism, though. And some judicious sniping would be likely.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

If y'all ask, our economically developed states will fight on your side. Just promise us you'll adopt us afterwards. We'll do it for Tim's

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Fuck yeah brother, I’m with you

I'm building explosive filled toques.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No need to invade. The US can just tamper with our elections enough to get people in power that'll just roll over and give them everything

[–] gift_of_gab@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know who downvoted you, but whomever did go check out Danielle Smith in Alberta. She sure likes Trump, and Ford over in Ontario used Roger Stone as a campaign advisor.

Trump has created a problem for the Cons, though:

"The start of a tariff war with the United States is changing voters' moods. It's harder to talk about a broken Canada when there's a growing sense of patriotism," another Conservative source said.

Our Cons need bogeymen to rile up our Centrist voters. They rail about borderguards or evil carbon taxes (that are given back to the vast majority of Canadians) or whatever, only now we're getting Nationalist Cons rising up, despite their favourite leader Harper being a vanguard of International Conservatism.

We have an absolute issue up here with our Con voters, (when Léger asked Canadians about the Biden-Trump match up in the fall of 2020, 41 per cent of Conservative voters sided with Trump.) and they are extremely susceptible to Russian propaganda:

image

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

From the recent polls I've been seeing, Trump has apparently reminded a lot of conservative voters that they are Canadian. When asked how we should respond to Trump's tariffs, "equal retaliation" and "escalation" combined for like 80%.

This whole thing seems to have poked that button we have where we can watch a hockey game, see someone start a fistfight over a perceived slight, and consider that a perfectly reasonable response.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, a reminder to Canadians that our blueshirts (equivalent to brownshirts etc) were rounded up and interned during WW2. They got back to work somewhat right after because the country was still freakin racist, but it took until recently for actual fascism-with-Skippy to pop up again.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Currently, Trumps team is just trying to get something boiling so that if/when polievre gets in power, the situation can be "resolved" without bloodshed.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm definitely curious to see what happens in the polls when we find out who the Liberals choose. I don't get the impression that people really trust Poilievre to handle Trump.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Canadians are not as pathetic as us Americans, who've been rolling over for 50 years.

They will fight.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

After 20 million scared civilians are neutralized and pacified.... it will look like a fait accompli.
and then will come the car bombs, the mass shootings, the assassination's.

The only thing stupider than Russia invading Ukraine and expecting not to deal with a massive insurgency. Two countries that are culturally very close but had extremely bad history with each other as a cycle of abuse, is America trying to do the same thing with Canada,

Treachery is according to the divine comedy, the worst sin of all. Canada doesn't have the boon of bordering other allies trying to help them in an imperialist war from their supposed brothers. but being stabbed in the back will sure motivate people to do things they wouldnt dream of against people they used to call friends. Yes, I'm referring to the "T" word.

also. theres no way Canada gets attacked, and it doesn't cause a revolution or coup in the US. The first moves into Canada, would effectively be the first moves of a 2nd Civil War.