this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
76 points (96.3% liked)

Privacy

33588 readers
961 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I currently use KeepassXC that is synced through NextCloud. The sync isn't very elegant, especially on my phone. So I'm looking for a new password manager, which has a native server sync support that I can self host. What do y'all recommend? I need at least a phone app and a browser integration that can autofill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmbarrassedDrum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bitwarden.

My recommendation: Don't use Vaultwarden (self hostable server side of bitwarden. Really easy to run and use). Why? You're not a security personal, and securing your vault isn't your job. You might do a slight mistake that'll lead to the compromise of your vault.

The people at Bitwarden have their work dedicated to securing the vaults and all they do is security. And they'll probably do it better then you. When it comes to serious matter, I prefer to trust the professionals.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Ignoring the security aspect of it Bitwarden is responsible for hosting a fault tolerant, highly available web app.

They have redundant networking, redundant servers, load balancers, redundant databases.

While you could host this yourself to these tolerances it's work and it's not free.

If you're using your password manager to the fullest you have a different password for every resource out there. It's more than a minor inconvenience if you get locked out of your passwords.

Their service is dirt cheap and it's absolutely worth every penny.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to play devils advocate. Bitwarden.com is a much more valuable target. My instance is behind a VPN. I think its actually far more likely Bitwarden will have a breach similar to LastPass then I will. But I agree with you mostly.

[–] asap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The data stored on Bitwarden's servers is completely encrypted though, which means a breach will not yield useful data, unlike the plain text storage for LastPass.

I have the ability to selfhost BW so I am interested in counterpoints.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Yes I agree. I was just offering a counter to the statement that Vaultwarden isnt as safe as Bitwarden. They both are encrypted but my vaultwarden instance is a lot less likely to experience a breach than Bitwarden. The guys with real skill are going after Bitwarden not me.

[–] EpicGamer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Doesn't the server just hold an encrypted vault? What could go wrong when the server is compromised? Just thinking out loud I don't know the answer

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I just don't want any unauthorized persons anywhere near my vaults in general. I also see my vault as a critical service that requires high availability, and I know enough about system administration to know that my network and I are not qualified to provide that.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Security is also about backups. 3 Replicas 2 Formats 1 Offsite location

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago

Yep, that's right. In theory you could share the encrypted DB with the public and not degrade security. (Still don't do that though...)