this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
58 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44903 readers
897 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If our universe is bound by the laws of mathematics (big IF), then any theorem discovered within it has to be consistent or incomplete w.r.t it.
If a theorem is discovered that upends math as we know it, then the repercussions could be cosmic.

Again, big if about the universe being bound by the laws of maths

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Discovery a truth of the universe is not going to affect the truth of the universe.

You're appearing to claim something nonsensical. The sort of wow-bang nonsense one reads about in pop-science magazines.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

(I'm going to abrasively emphasize the conjunctions more, because I feel they're being glossed over)

IF the truths of our universe are completely mathematically and axiomatically bound, THEN any proof derived within it might have a chance of upsetting a given axiom given the either incomplete or inconsistent nature of mathematics as declared by Gödel, the ramifications of which COULD be dire in such a universe.

I'm NOT saying our universe IS mathematically bound. I'm also NOT saying that a newly discovered universal axiom WILL change the structure of such a universe.

I actually believe that maths merely describes our reality at varying scales.

I am presenting an interesting idea that for some reason is being taken quite literally, and now am having to get defensive about it as if it's a deeply-held belief of mine...