this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
741 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

28074 readers
3745 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 65 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The courts need to start deputizing large numbers of bailiffs to enforce their orders. Forget relying on funding from Congress for it; I'm sure they'll have plenty of volunteers. Musk and his goons refuse to comply with court orders? Haul them into court at the point of a bayonet. I'm sure you'll have no shortage of patriotic Americans also willing to donate weapons to arm these new bailiffs.

The courts need to seriously build out their capacity to enforce orders independent of the executive branch. They need muscle.

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Today, the primary responsibilities of U.S. Marshals include protecting federal judges and witnesses, transporting federal prisoners, apprehending federal fugitives, and managing assets seized from criminal enterprises.

Oh, sweet.

The President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints U.S. Marshals for a 4-year term.

Oh. Oh no.

https://www.gao.gov/assets/a91787.html#%3A%7E%3Atext=The+President%2C+with+the+advice%2Cfor+a+4-year+term.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 12 points 13 hours ago

Exactly. That's why my point is that there may be other mechanisms for courts to deputize or recruit people to serve as enforcers for the court.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Whoa now, that's a bit reactionary.

The reason for the shit show is that it's all based on good faith. And if a power hungry dictator tries to control the executive....well, the legislative is supposed to keep him in check.

It's also based on the presumption that the people wouldn't willingly elect, let alone re-elect, a blatantly corrupt president and Congress that enables them...or at least have few enough bad ones to be able to break party lines and put a stop to it.

Ideally, enough Republicans on Congress would have enough of a spine to actually put country before party and stop this shit. Start impeaching judges and presidents. Don't let anything else get done.

Nope. They all sold out on their party. Fucking despicable. Not even worth spitting on.

I can't wait till someone spills the beans on whatever kompromat or bribes or imperius curse has got such a tight grip on the party.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The Legislative and Judiciary can only keep the Executive in check, if the people with guns in the Executive are willing to listen to them, rather than the superiors giving them orders.

You have "Legislatives" in dictatorships too. but when they refuse to obey the military any longer, they either get disappeared, get a sham process over something they allegedly did, or at best you get a civil war.

Or how Cersay Lannister said in Game of Thrones: "Power is Power". When push comes to shove, the question is who do the people with guns listen to. Everything around it is just fluff. Unless large parts of the Military and Police defect and take care of their superior and then hand power back to the normal institutions, or there is a peoples uprising and subsequent civil war, the power will not go back.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The legislative holds the power to impeach presidents and judges.

But that'll only happen if enough Republicans grow a spine.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

They have the power, if and only if the Police and Army are listening to them based on this being what the laws say.

With Adams in New York we already see an example, how to create a layer of corrupt loyalists that could tell the police to act differently.

[–] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I came to a bit of a realization some time ago. Every time you think of some possible new government function, or legislation, or resolution to an issue, you cynically think of every way it could be abused, right? You’re confident that greedy, self-aggrandizing politicians or businessmen will use it to further their own power and wealth. The concept that someone will act in good faith is absent. It’s infantile, it’s naive. The world is cruel.

I think this represents a fundamental breakdown of the trust in our government. The US has been coasting on good faith for almost 300 years, and the wheels are falling off. It’s a vicious cycle, where if you don’t trust that other people will do the right thing, you’re less likely to do the right thing yourself. I don’t know if this cycle can be ended, or even if it has an end.