The Legend of Zelda

3671 readers

1 users here now

A community for everything related to The Legend of Zelda franchise!

Rules:

1. Be a decent human being.
1. Fanart must be credited.
1. No untagged spoilers of new games.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

N3DSdude@lemmy.ml

NOT NSFW. I Just don’t know how to tag spoilers on mobile. Story discussion in post (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by Uprise42@kbin.social to c/zelda@lemmy.ml

NSFW 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m confused on the story in Totk. I know totk is after BotW, but I’m curious about the other events in the game. The game talks about a war, which is the imprisoning war. This would put it squarely in the “hero is defeated” timeline before the events of a link to the past.

“7 sages seal away Ganon in the imprisoning war”

What is confusing me however is that Rauru is claimed to be the first king of Hyrule. Hyrule however was founded well before the imprisoning war. It was actually founded shortly after the bandaging of the twili and sealing of the sacred realm. Now, in the timeline it states that sage Rauru seals the sacred realm to protect the tri-force. But that isn’t the imprisoning war, nor do I think it’s the same Rauru. But it also states that Skyward Sword Zelda’s descendants founded Hyrule shortly after the sealing of the sacred realm. Skyward Sword Zelda wasn’t a Zonai though.

Does anyone understand the timeline enough to explain what I am missing? It just feels like Rauru is too many people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Uprise42@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like that should be the case, but Nintendo has put themselves in the corner by releasing an “official” timeline. But this would have been pretty easy to fix by simply not calling Rauru the first king of Hyrule. And not making him Zonai. If he’d been a Hylian king that wasn’t the first it would make perfect sense…