this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

9307 readers
601 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Those are both much cheaper than the 5080 and significantly cheaper than the 5090.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And most likely a lot slower as well. You should probably compare them with 5070 / 5070Ti.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Most benchmarks I've seen put them around 5070ti for RT performance and 5080 for raster performance. They're about where AMD thought the 5070 was going to be before NVidia surprised us all with such a dissapointing launch.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

How does it compare to the RX 7800XT etc. tho?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Are they suppsot to be competitive with nvidia top end?

[–] theboomr@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

According to AMD themselves, no.