this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
154 points (96.4% liked)

News

25269 readers
4806 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's literally being marketed to them...

From the article:

Who is this for, you might ask? A video posted on January 6, 2025, that runs just over two minutes gives the game away. It opens with a photo of assassinated UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. “We’re going to run through a scenario to demonstrate, where if a Protector had been present, crisis could have been averted,” the Protector says in the video. He then runs through several fantasy versions of the assassination where a Protector is on hand to prevent the assassin from killing the CEO.

Also,

This is for people with more money than sense who are also paranoid as fuck.

You've just described CEOs.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, it's literally being marketed to paranoid people.

Do you honestly think CEOs of major corporations would stoop to hiring their security through a non-vetted app?

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. Almost no CEO would've had a security detail before now. Also, minimising costs is their lifeblood. They'll definitely be using this.

Your average paranoid Joe can't afford to hire some goons to hang around him. And the people on the board of investors don't need celebrity like CEOs do, so they're largely unknown to the public, so don't need this service.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm sorry... you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives? These are people who own multiple mansions and have collections of sport cars.

And of course no CEO would have one before now. No one was suggesting otherwise. But now they do. And there are already companies out there they can hire that have vetted, experienced people who come heavily-armed and highly-trained, so why would they use this app?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

A lot of CEOs have had security teams for ages. Like UHC said themselves, they get death threats all the time.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry... you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives?

Quite literally, yes. Their commitment to being as cheap as possible is pathological. Not frugal, cheap.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand how one can have multiple mansions and luxury cars, and then we get into things like the tailored suits and the fancy dinners, and also be cheap. That fits no definition of the word 'cheap' I know.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know, it's a bit counterintuitive. But look at the Cheeto as a prime example. He's one of the biggest cheapskates around. He'll try and get out of paying for anything he possibly can. It's all slash and burn tactics with these people. It's all they know. They don't care if their bodyguards are from temu, because they're largely just for show.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

He doesn't try to get out of paying for things he wants.