this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10176 readers
176 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I want to believe...
Same. It’s hard to care about these clickbait titles when nothing has stuck to him or changed his supporter’s opinions.
Worse, his poling seems to improve after each indictment. He's good at spinning them into narratives that gain him support.
We’ve seen his lawyer go to prison before and that pattern may repeat here. We’ll just have to see whether he ends up seeing the inside of a cell along with them.
Luckily, voting plays zero role in court cases. Changing the minds of the electorate is never the goal of a criminal case, and as to "nothing has stuck to him" ... that's simply not true. (And even if it were, past performance is not indicative of future results.)
Voting will play a real big role in this court case if he pardons himself.
Completely separate issue. The national electorate != the jury in this specific case.
I don't see how it's separate. If he pardons himself, nothing that happens at this trial will actually matter.
This is why the state charges out of Georgia matter.