this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
1376 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

6218 readers
5136 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like to thank everyone for my most upvoted post on lemmy ever. Not only have you upvoted it to the top for like 2 days you commented the shit out of it. I'd like to take this opportunity to say fuck the mods of this instance. This was my second post coming off a 30 day ban and I want to say these fucking mods have been nothing but bitches. I've never been more attacked on any other instance, subreddit, forum, etc. then I have been in this fucking instance. Not only have I been attacked I've been told my memes arent memey enough again and again.

I'll be honest, I do not know how to make a meme but I keep posting just to piss in these mods cheerios.

Thanks lemmy.world/politicalmemes for being the worst community I've ever been a part of.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If the government is this centralized that makes it easy to revolt. Just topple the state government and make your own rules. Then the "power" has to first get into their cars and drive all the way to you.

Revolutions moetly dont start in the populated areas where the government has many of it goons. They start in the thinly populated areas, where it is easy to seize local control.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guess who those thinly populated areas voted for...

Also, "just topple the state governments" as if most US states aren't larger + more dispersed than many European countries. And state (and sometimes local) police have access to second hand military equipment.

Then even putting that aside, the US interstate system was quite literally designed to expedite military logistics. The Federal government could have tanks rolling down the streets of any major city in single-digit hours.

However, the size of the country is a double edged sword. Locking down areas outside of populated cities would take a lot of sustained resources. Combine that with the sheer volume of firearms in the hands of private citizens and you have a recipe for festering unrest. Actual violent resistance in the US would be a different beast from what you see in other countries.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. i should clarify "easy to revolt" is only in relative terms. Any uprising against a regime that doesn't crumble right away is a bloody and difficult endeavor. That is why usually people only get to that point, when their basic livelihood is in immediate danger.

Still i think that the US has the unique situation of having relatively well armed civilians. So where in other countries you have unarmed mass protests that get shot down by the regime, followed by improvised weapons until the people manage to arm themselves from seized government stocks... In the US you have a mayor head start. Finally when it comes to the regime cracking down on people, the risk-reward calculation of police and soldiers can quickly change from shooting at the crowd to joining the crowd, if the crowd is armed.

In the end after each regime falls, the lessons is "if we had banded together earlier and fought them right away, a lot of bloodshed and destruction could have been prevented."

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

Still i think that the US has the unique situation of having relatively well armed civilians

This is a double-edged sword. In other countries the government is really reluctant to have the military shoot protesters, because the protesters are civilians and, pretty much by definition, unarmed. If the police or military do shoot protesters, the undecided public is very likely to turn against the government for slaughtering innocent, unarmed civilians.

In the US, police are terrified of civilians, and are more than willing to shoot them. Civilians are fairly likely to be armed, so if the government claims that the civilians shot first, a lot of people will believe them.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I live in California... Why the fuck would we topple one of the few good governments in the US?

Is this thread full of people pushing propaganda? These are such stupid suggestions...

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

ITT: A lot of Europeans who have functioning mass transit systems and countries smaller than a lot of our states.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yess, this is the way, try to get your state creating an ultimatum and if conditions are not met, leave the unity of states and get independent.