this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
596 points (99.0% liked)

tumblr

3719 readers
835 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 65 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have a hard time imagining that capital owners would rather pay workers to supervise AI than make the courts look the other way when a self-driving truck creates accidents ...

[–] gex@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe it could be a single person monitoring 10 autonomous trucks from a remote control center

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That would be easier if they attached the trucks to each other.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, and then they could put them on prebuilt tracks to limit and control their intersections with other traffic!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I think you're on to something

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago

Bingo. Simply look to the military for the future. Kids sitting in a comfortable location in California dropping bombs on children overseas.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

At some point it probably becomes more valuable to offer jobs that barely keep people alive than it does to deal with the sheer number of unemployed people who are now ready to burn everything down.

Then again, capitalism has never been good at externalities.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I expect a resurgence of jobs like "servant" and "shoe-shiner". You don't need these, either, but this way capitalists can lord their wealth over the masses face-to-face.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not sure they want that face-to-face with people that far below them. Too easy for any one of them to Luigi.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is part of the equation that they've proven themselves consistently awful at assessing properly.

There was this guy who did a bunch of interviews with super wealthy people about their apocalypse shelter plans, and he was like "What stops all the poors from killing you and taking your stuff?"

And they're like "Oh, we have ex-Navy SEAL private security details, we're good."

So the guy asks them "What stops the SEALs from killing you and taking your stuff?"

They were stumped. Not a one of them had a good answer. Like, one guy floated having the only password to the vault where all the supplies are kept, as if Navy SEALs don't know how to torture information out of someone. Waterboarding was that guy's best case outcome.

They really, really don't understand that they need us, but we don't need them. And the only thing keeping them alive is that we haven't really figured that out yet either.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Give it a couple generations of malnutrition and genetic damage. Those lower classes will look like toasters and microwaves. Ez to face.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Probably they do both. The paid drivers are a bit of a side-project to get government subsidies for 'job creation' and such.