this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
476 points (99.0% liked)

World News

41223 readers
2801 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock warned that forcing Ukraine into an unfair peace deal would lead to more war, rejecting any agreement that concedes territory to Russia without security guarantees.

She urged Europe to pressure the U.S. to support its NATO allies. Meanwhile, Trump dismissed Zelensky's role in peace talks, claiming Ukraine has "no cards" to negotiate.

U.S.-Ukraine relations remain strained, though some American officials signaled continued support.

Trump's team insists Zelensky will eventually accept a U.S. rare earth mineral deal despite Kyiv’s current resistance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ukraine does not have nuclear weapons. They gave them up for peace...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No one's ever going to do that again. Trump has guaranteed a new era of nuclear proliferation.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That's why they have to test the new ones.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While the nuclear weapons where physically present on Ukraine soil, the country did not have operational control over them.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Not all require launch codes. Especially not those delivered by plane. The rest they could dismantle and repurpose.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago

Yup, all the launch codes and mechanisms were in Kremlin

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But they have the capability right? Truly if they wanted to have a nuke I'm positive they could build one.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The stuff you need to make this sort of thing isn't off the shelf, they would have to buy or build a shitload of these

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_centrifuge

and its not cheap, these are just maintenance cost (and upgrades)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/752531/nuclear-weapons-spending-worldwide-by-country/

Ukraine's gdp is around 170 billion, so it isn't really something they could afford to just crank up.

On a personal note, I hope we as a species never fire another one of these weapons ever again.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How does pakistan and nkorea do it then?

[–] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

north korea does not need to pay its employees and has state sponsored hackers extorting hospitals. idk what revenue streams pakistan has. while the knowledge isn't hard to get, usually the problem is sourcing enough radioactive materials.