this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
376 points (79.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7603 readers
1115 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s the compromise for the vulnerable that most often gets brought up in this situation. A protest vote in a broken first-past-the-post election system generally helps the opposition to your vote. Republicans have demonstrated they hate the vulnerable (disabled, poor, debt-ridden) and Democrats are weak in their opposition, but if you want the help those that are vulnerable you would generally not want to subject them to Republicans, whom benefit from your protest vote.

Another argument is that if you fracture the opposition to bootlickers, the bootlickers will win.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I am sorry, but as a black man, I am supposed to be your sacrificial lamb and your fucking compromise for you for what? So you feel safe in your fucking neighborhood? I am sure that all black people and Palestinian Americans will agree when I say: “Fuck you from the bottom of my heart”

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 27 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

the better argument is that our system is both intentionally keeping these groups vulnerable and, in large part, using them as bait to get you to vote the way they want you to; effectively entrapping you into this system so that you remain ignorant of the fact these same vulnerable groups are empowered and the driving force for change outside this country.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

whom benefit from your protest vote.

Who*