546

Summary

Tesla investors, frustrated by the stock’s decline, are demanding accountability from Elon Musk, who recently illegally demanded federal employees justify their paychecks.

Shareholders took to Musk’s social media platform X, asking him to similar list his contributions to Tesla.

The stock has fallen for six straight sessions, underperforming the Nasdaq.

Meanwhile, Musk faced backlash for overstepping in government affairs, forcing Trump to smooth tensions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

I think the answer is that no one knows because it’s not a publicly traded company. But I would bet on no, it isn’t profitable, nor will it be for the next 100 years. It is however the good part of Elon’s legacy, and if he stayed out of politics he would have been remembered as one of the greatest men in history for the leapfrog in space exploration that he ignited.

You really do have to die a hero or you live long enough to become the villain.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Elon's legacy now is that he's the foreign Nazi who finally took control of the United States government.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Too bad spacex is getting a lot bad press from dumping illegally, and ignoring safety regulations

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

We don't know, it's a private company and doesn't have to publish. I could see it being profitable because it gets money from the government, but based on how Musk runs his companies I could also see it being a dumpster fire behind the scenes.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

I didn't know how true anything is these days, but from what I've read he's mostly hands off at SpaceX.

[-] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

There was an anonymous statement by an employee that SpaceX basically has a small department whose entire purpose was to keep Musk distracted from anything important whenever he would get involved with "running" the company. Pretty sure the article I read that in said that they confirmed the employee's identity and it would explain a lot about their surprisingly successful work.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Yes I've seen the same information but didn't remember the details. I think you're spot on.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Upper management basically keeps him distracted with shiny toys so he doesn't interfere with the "class" like a toddler

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
546 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31007 readers
2498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS