this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
370 points (79.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7603 readers
1115 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Probably because two political parties isn't enough to truly represent the population.

People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world's smallest box.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Countries with more parties such as those in Western Europe are also electing fascists. The answer doesn't lie in more parties. China has a majority party and it doesn't get people doing the Sieg Heil

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Duverger's Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we're going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that's what you're looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The major political parties may have only changed names once, but the most common stance in modern political science is that we are in the 6th political party alignment in US history.

  • Centralization 1796-1824
  • Jacksonians 1828-1852
  • Republicans 1856-1892
  • Progressives 1898-1928
  • New Dealers 1932-1972
  • Neoliberalism 1980-Present