this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
261 points (95.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5895 readers
840 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Literally the majority of the video is just random left-bashing lmao

And then proposing "super-capitalism" as a solution what an absolute clown

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

are you against worker co-ops?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Are you?

Adam Something has repeatedly used "Super Capitalism" as a conservative-friendly way of saying worker co-ops. You'd know this if you paid attention to the video, or watched his other videos.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

I did pay attention to the video. I understand what he's aiming to do with rebranding leftist ideas as "super-capitalist" I just think it's a completely braindead move. It doesn't matter how much you try to avoid the label, of you pose any genuine threat to capital then you will be branded as a socialist whether you are or not, even if you do manage to trick some gullible rubes by lying to them (which would be unlikely to work in the first place).

I have no particular problem with worker co-ops, I do absolutely have a problem with this idiotic nonsense. If you allow the socialist label to be a boogeyman you are shooting yourself in the foot, it's literally how we got here in the first place.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 0 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

Did you watch a different video? He said that reality-challenged tankie spaces aren't able to contribute to a leftist movement that is able to attract workers.

That sounds entirely accurate to me.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

tankie spaces aren’t able to contribute to a leftist movement

Right, like I said, left-bashing.

Btw, is Hasan Piker a tankie? Because he bashed him too, and he's by far the largest leftist politics streamer with an enormous influence and broad appeal. But I guess he's not ideologically pure enough for Adam Something so therefore he's a tankie and useless.

His whole way of thinking is entirely idealist, as if creating an ideologically pure movement (ironically, by ditching any semblance of socialism including even the word, in favor of "super capitalism"), the left will automatically win. Nowhere in the video does he discuss any positive vision or any actually strategy other than punching left. Obviously, he serves as nothing but an off-ramp to get people to abandon leftist ideas they might otherwise be inclined towards, the only question is whether he's doing it intentionally or is just a useful idiot of the right.