517
Ngl this is what every single one of you fucking liberals calling me out about my substandard research practices makes me feel .
—— And you know like to be clear I am saying that as like that’s a Me problem. I need to figure out how the fuck to be able to accept criticism or none of this is gonna get to a point where it’s worth Jack.
But there is a very specific agenda here. So say to people who already think that the NYT is bad, that the NYT employs people without even the slightest understanding of history. I highly doubt this happened.
Maybe your trust of this institution is severely miss placed.
https://www.techdirt.com/2024/10/28/ny-times-gets-230-wrong-again-misrepresenting-history-law-and-the-first-amendment/
When I went looking for this there’s MANY more.
Yes if I don't believe something very extreme, I must believe its precise opposite. NYT is my God, and all.
Don’t downvote people for being skeptical on the internet folks, we want to encourage it.
Am I doing that? Seems to me like that's getting done to me.
Correct, it's good to be skeptical
Yeah I was reacting to you getting downvotes.
...So, you think her story is too unbelievable, that the NYT would never do such a thing, and that she made it up to push a specific agenda?
Hm...
Yes, I too am sure of every idea I have