91
It's time to take Trump seriously, investors say as markets recoil
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
91 points (98.9% liked)
World News
58349 readers
1766 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean, I think that there's an extremely straightforward purposeful direction. He campaigned on tariffs. He appeals principally to a group of people who want protectionist trade policy. Those people are in swing states and don't like trade with Canada and Mexico. He's worked hard to give the impression that he's adopted protectionist policy in the past. Why would he stop?
I don't think that there needs to be some kind of more-complicated plan. You've already got a plan on the table in front of you. The only degree of complication is that Trump's tended to aim to give the impression that he's adopting considerably more-protectionist trade policy than he actually is.
I mean, Goldman Sachs is publicly-traded, and you can short them. That will -- by a tiny amount -- decrease the amount of the company. Unless you're throwing around huge amounts of money, they won't notice, though, and I'd call the whole process of activist investment generally not very sensible, as in an efficient market, capital from other investors should flow into the hole you've created and pull the value of the company back up. I've heard the process of activist investing described as "trying to bail a hole in a lake". I don't think that that's a good way to express disagreement with the CEO of the company, and would consider doing so to be an unwise decision in terms of your own finances.
I've seen a lot of moves by people on various communities here who are upset over one aspect or another of the Trump administration talking about or encouraging things that I'm pretty sure aren't going to do much to stop them. This includes:
Not buying any products from anyone for one day.
Highlighting some vehicles being burned at a Tesla dealership in France.
Highlighting a row of Tesla superchargers being burned in Massachusetts.
Spamming a DOGE email address.
Some of those can potentially be personally-costly, like giving someone jail time, but I don't think that anything on there will likely stop Trump or Musk from doing things or reverse what they're doing.
I'm gonna repeat the last comment I made on the topic: if someone
assuming that they're in the US
legitimately wants to stop the stuff the Trump administration is doing, the most-direct route is probably for the Democrats to flip the House in the midterms. It's likely that they will cheerfully disrupt a lot of this, to the extent that they can. Right now, the GOP holds a trifecta, and Congressional Republicans are very likely to be very hesitant to do anything that starts a fight with the President and might threaten their legislative agenda, even people like Lisa Murkowski, who has been pretty vocally upset with Trump. The Democrats, on the other hand, have every incentive to do so. I'd go link up with the Democratic Party -- I know that they take volunteers, though I've never done so myself -- and ask what someone can volunteer to do to flip the House in the midterms. That's nearly 23 months from now, which is a while, but that's the biggest hammer readily available.
kagis
They do have this "volunteer" page, including with some checkboxes as to what one wants to volunteer to help do. I don't see specifically "flip the House in the midterms", but some similar-sounding stuff is in there, and I'm sure that if someone gets in touch with them and talks to a human trying to organize volunteers, they can probably hook someone up with whatever is going on there.