this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
1056 points (97.4% liked)

196

17163 readers
2689 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know I am the minority in this but I would take the 30 year payment. Let’s use the 320 million as the example. It would prevent me from spending it all on dumb shit and I could easily live off of 888,000 a month pre tax. Pay off all debts right away and force me to save up for any huge thing I want.

It would also pass to my kids if I die in the next 30 years.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is still in your favor to take the lump sum, then invest it yourself. Even low risk low return you'll likely end up way ahead compared to the payment plan.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I agree about the investment, I’m just saying that this prevents me from falling into the “ohh I can buy that” trap.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For me, I have two concerns (like it matters, I'm never winning). The organization running the lottery could fold and I can likely make more investing the lump sum myself. Plus I really want to start a nonprofit grocery chain.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Even worse is that if the state you won in had financial issues they can and will hold payments until the budget is balanced. I recall hearing something about Illinois holding lottery payments when there was a shutdown.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Facts and statistics say the organization running the lottery is IMMENSELY less likely to run out of money than YOU. Take the annuity. Winning the lottery does not suddenly make one smart with money.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Up until recently, I'd take the annuity, but right now, the stability of the underlying currency and the organization that pays out is in serious doubt.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Even in today's political climate I'm pretty sure the State of California will still be able to make your payments over 30 years. If you didn't spend it on anything else, you could make a start on that grocery chain. You'd probably learn a lot in the first few years, some expensive lessons. But having started small, you could put the next payments towards putting those lessons to work as you expand. Meanwhile, you're not investing any attention or risk into those funds. But you do hypothetical you!

Editing to add, the guy who actually won might be able to do some real good in his own neighborhood, which had that big wildfire.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Fuckin hell that payment would pay off my mortgage in 20 days. I cannot fathom spending that much every fucking month